The justifications for affirmative action

Those who do aim at a good life seek the means of obtaining bodily pleasures; and, since the enjoyment of these appears to depend on property, they are absorbed in getting wealth: But this would apply equally to democracies, for they too may be founded on violence, and then the acts of the democracy will be neither more nor less acts of the state in question than those of an oligarchy or of a tyranny.

It meant in regard to race only what the Constitution meant. Institutions could for one or another good reason properly depart from standard meritocratic selection criteria because the whole system of tying economic reward to earned credentials was itself indefensible.

Preferring members of any one group for no reason other than race or ethnic origin is discrimination for its own sake. What rights were at issue?

Affirmative Action

His vote, added to the four votes of the Stevens group, meant that Allan Bakke won his case and that Powell got to write the opinion of the Court. But we are wandering from the subject. Opponents of affirmative action often frame their position in moral terms.

How to Diversify the Faculty (2006)

But, if all communities aim at some good, the state or political community, which is the highest of all, and which embraces all the rest, aims at good in a greater degree than any other, and at the highest good.

If the subject, how can he obey well? A considers whether it is fair to identify current society as the relevant wrongdoer. Rowman and Allanheld; revised edition, Lanham, Maryland: Sexting and the related criminal ramifications for minors have taken center stage in recent years.

A recent study by the Glass Ceiling Commission, a body established under President Bush and legislatively sponsored by Senator Dole, 37 recently reported that: The Medical School of the University of California at Davis exemplified a particularly aggressive approach.

Part IV Property is a part of the household, and the art of acquiring property is a part of the art of managing the household; for no man can live well, or indeed live at all, unless he be provided with necessaries. Yet this so-called science is not anything great or wonderful; for the master need only know how to order that which the slave must know how to execute.

Critics of preferences retorted by pointing to the law. What we mean by perversion will be hereafter explained.

Affirmative Action

InPresident Kennedy was the first to use the term "affirmative action" in an Executive Order that directed government contractors to take "affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment, without regard to their race, creed, color, or national origin.

The Helen of Theodectes says: This suggests that the law has had a marginal effect on the sex of the chair and the boards remain internally segregated. A particularly graphic case of discrimination occurred during a fair housing test performed by the Civil Rights Division in Wisconsin, which sought to establish whether discrimination existed against the relatively large East-Asian population there.

Part III Whether they ought to be so or not is a question which is bound up with the previous inquiry.

Policy Type and Justification Influences on Support for Affirmative Action Policies

Hence we may infer that retail trade is not a natural part of the art of getting wealth; had it been so, men would have ceased to exchange when they had enough.

A potential moral conflict thus arises between society's obligation to refrain from "reverse" racial discrimination and its obligation to remedy past discrimination.

What is the justification for affirmative action?

Useful sources of such principles include well-settled doctrines of law, domestic and international, that incorporate principles of corrective justice. Neither he nor other critics thought so. Malaysia provides affirmative action to the majority because in general, the Malays have lower incomes than the Chinese, who have traditionally been involved in businesses and industries, but who were also general migrant workers.

Indeed, the thesis of this Article is that principles central to arguments made against affirmative action support as much as negate a societal obligation to remedy effects of past racial injustice.

Now instruments are of various sorts; some are living, others lifeless; in the rudder, the pilot of a ship has a lifeless, in the look-out man, a living instrument; for in the arts the servant is a kind of instrument.

For as political science does not make men, but takes them from nature and uses them, so too nature provides them with earth or sea or the like as a source of food. The source of the confusion is the near connection between the two kinds of wealth-getting; in either, the instrument is the same, although the use is different, and so they pass into one another; for each is a use of the same property, but with a difference: These Justices reason that racial discrimination, even for benign purposes, is morally objectionable and that the Constitution forbids the government from engaging in such immoral practices absent a compelling justification.

Elites, to be legitimate, must serve a representative function: But they are, and to say affirmative action is immoral, or irrelevant, is ludicrous.Applied to affirmative action, these principles support conservative claims that a state is obligated to make amends to white victims of racial preferences.

These principles, however, also support America's responsibility for. “Affirmative action” means positive steps taken to increase the representation of women and minorities in areas of employment, education, and culture from which they have been historically excluded. Affirmative action, also known as reservation in India and Nepal, positive action in the UK, and employment equity (in a narrower context) in Canada and South Africa, is the policy of promoting the education and employment of members of groups that are known to have previously suffered from discrimination.

Affirmative action policies are those in which an institution or organization actively engages in efforts to improve opportunities for historically excluded groups in American society. Affirmative action policies often focus on employment and education.

In institutions of higher education. constitutionally permissible justifications for affirmative action programs and the methods colleges and universities, may use to create diversity that may be permissible under the Fourth Circuit's opinion. The Diversity Justification for Affirmative Action in Higher Education: Is Hopwood v.

Texas Right affirmative action has on innocent, The diversity justification for affirmative action first appeared in Justice Powell's opinion in Regents of the University of.

The justifications for affirmative action
Rated 3/5 based on 52 review