He was a black teenager, and his relatives claim, wrongfully accused of a murder that he could not possibly have committed. The 10th juror flippantly states, "A kid kills his father.
Think about the number system to identify the jurors. The 8th juror also states that just because the boy cannot remember the details of the movie does not automatically disprove his alibi or his guilt.
The painter's experience of apartments near an el-train also reveal the difficulty a witness would have hearing the boy. Therefore, a focus on the safeguards yields benefits beyond the achievement of justice. Although the McCarthyist witch-hunts caused a legacy of suspicion, Rose suggests that 'reasonable doubt' remains the best safeguard of justice.
The 5th Juror's "slum background" and upbringing empower him to challenge the angle of the knife wound and the 9th Juror's age creates doubt in the reliability of the old man's testimony.
More Essay Examples on Common law Rubric The jury however, is a cross-section of American society as it comprises of educated, old, working-class, business and even immigrant men. He wishes to punish the young boy for the pain his own son has inflicted upon him.
Rose deliberately assigns to each juror a personal narrative which reflects his view that many of the jurors tend to be influenced by their circumstances and experiences which further shape, and often entrench, their biased opinions.
The 8th juror also states that just because the boy cannot remember the details of the movie does not automatically disprove his alibi or his guilt. Save us a lot of time and money. This is intended by the playwright as the value of each juror is as a social representation, not as individuals.
How to Write a Summary of an Article? Save us a lot of time and money. Rose suggests this attitude, which is compounded by the heat, is counterproductive to the notion of active citizenship.
The process can empower the disempowered and act as a resounding model for a democratic society. In a sense this depersonalises the jury members to show that their personalities should not play a factor. Throughout the film it appears that he cares little about the arguments being made; his greatest concern is get to a verdict in time to make it to the evening baseball game; played by Jack Warden.
This seemingly honest and simply request fuels a great deal of dramatic tension among the jurors, many of whom are predisposed to conflicting views.
The deconstruction of these obstacles finally paves the way for an honest and just outcome. He is the juror who most faithfully follows the disembodied voice of the judge and his reminder that the jurors must deliberate "honestly and thoughtfully"and sift "fact" from "fancy". The 8th Juror also represents possible strengths of the jury system as an element of the legal system.
The unlocking of the door and the knife in the table - which was critical to the fact-finding process - suggest that prejudice has been dispelled. The 6th juror who is a house painter has had experience of apartments that overlook an el line and can testify to the noise. Other jurors, most notable Juror 1, confirm that they saw the same thing.
The variety of symbolic techniques show how Rose supports the 'not guilty' verdict and his view that 'reasonable doubt', if applied rigorously and insightfully, can expose personals aspects and agendas that may conspire to affect a fair trial. Initially, as the jurors respond to the task of judging the guilt or innocence of the 16 year old boy, charged with first degree murder of his father, shortcomings are flagrantly obvious.
Typically, the jurors, who are all white males of around middle age, are not representative of the broader community, and many are hostile towards the young boy. An angry Juror 3 accuses Juror 5, who grew up in a slum, of changing his vote out of sympathy towards slum children.
Rose also suggests that the room and personal interests of the jury members make it difficult for them to sit for a long period of time.
The 10th juror concedes that he has been outmaneuvered by the "smart bastards" precisely because he must recognize that his bigoted misconceptions cannot prove the boy's guilt. Just like that," evincing that there is no element of doubt in his mind.
The reminder that "he's not your boy", finally shames him into concurring with the 'not guilty' verdict. In many ways, such diversity of provides a plethora of contexts for identification which in turn helps the jurors gain an insight into the flaws of the evidence.
The most bigoted jurors 3rd and 10th are the last to concede defeat because of their deeply held convictions. In Twelve Angry Men, Rose highlights the potential flaws that can be found in the jury system, where prejudice interferes and the pursuit of justice. They want a quick verdict. Through the 8th juror's gaze through the window to the New York Skyline, Rose suggests that the delivery of justice and vigilance is important to ensure the protection of democratic values and to secure justice for those most in need of it protection.
The locked room appears as a metaphoric representation of their "locked minds" and their prejudice, which may lead to a miscarriage of justice. It is unequivocal that in the court-room drama, Twelve Angry Men, Reginald Rose imparts the notion that justice within the legal system is of greater concern than the truth.
Rose serves us with a timely reminder that we must accept our civic duties and remain self-aware and "watchful" for those who attempt to hinder the system in order witness what "makes us strong". In many ways, such diversity of provides a plethora of contexts for identification which in turn helps the jurors gain an insight into the flaws of the evidence.
Despite his insistence to scrutinize the evidence, other jurors still base their votes on biases, attitudes and personal experiences.When reading the play “12 angry men”, is it hard to ignore the prominent character- ‘the 8th Juror’.
As the plot unfolds, the reader notices that Juror #8 is the only one among the 12 who really understands the seriousness of the situation at their hands.
Reginald Rose’s ‘Twelve Angry Men’ is a play which displays the twelve individual jurors’ characteristics through the deliberation of a first degree murder case. Out of the twelve jurors, the 8th Juror shows an outstanding heroism exists in his individual bravery and truthfulness.
12 Angry Men study guide contains a biography of Reginald Rose, literature essays, quiz questions, major themes, characters, and a full summary and analysis. 12 Angry Men by Reginald Rose. Buy Study Guide The action of the play begins as 8th Juror votes 'not guilty' against 11 votes of. Reginald Rose's Twelve Angry Men is a play concerning 12 jury men who experience the difficulties of coming to a unanimous decision regarding a 16 year old murder suspect.
In this case the importance of seeing things from more than one perspective is relevant as a young boy's life hangs in the balance. Prejudice in 12 Angry Men Essay; Twelve Angry Men highlights the importance of seeing things from more than one perspective.
Discuss. Reginald Rose’s play Twelve Angry Men emphasises the importance of seeing things from more than one perspective. Set in a New York jury room inRose highlights how important it is that the jury.
The faults in the play are displayed by the twelve juries that were selected to represent the case presented. The lack of knowledge, prejudice and the personality clashes are all examples of the flaws in the jury system that are shown in the Twelve Angry Men.Download